bucket foundation — inverse omega
§ Research · paper

Machine learning for scientific discovery: the solvability frontier

Gianangelo DichioBucket FoundationBucket Foundation report · 1.0 (full report)2026-10-08CC-BY-4.0 text; figures and data per file below

Corpus: solvability atlas, 5,209 problem statements across seven branches, bge-small-en-v1.5 embeddings, 50 stored neighbours per row

Abstract

A first pass, the Solver Gap Engine of 2026-09-30, ranked 1,364 open problems from the formal-conjectures repository by their nearest solved problem in another file and found 31 at cosine similarity 0.8 or above. The frontier is the second pass. We embed 5,209 problem statements across seven canon branches with a small sentence encoder, call a problem's reach its highest similarity to a solved problem, and draw a frontier at the 10th percentile of solved problems' reach, 0.762 on this set. Open problems are sorted into a reach class: 268 close to known results, 863 borderline and 954 that need a new idea.

A backtest at cutoffs 2005 and 2021, and frozen forecasts at 2005, 2015 and 2021, score the rule on the questions posed by those years under two outcome codings. Settled only: the inside rows settle at 24% against 5.9% outside at 2005 (161 and 68 rows, permutation p = 0.002, AUC 0.799), 22% against 3% at 2015 (p < 0.001, AUC 0.812) and 13% against 1% at 2021 (272 and 167 rows, p < 0.001, AUC 0.906); with the solved rows that have no resolved year removed, the 2005 gap holds (p = 0.020) and the 2021 gap shrinks but holds (p = 0.013); placing the 90 undecided 2005 rows outside reverses the 2005 comparison to 24% against 27%. Settled or advanced shows no gap: AUC 0.524, 0.554 and 0.543. The embeddings and stored neighbours come from the 2026 corpus and the embedding model postdates every cutoff, so the frozen forecasts are a retrospective check under that leak and no prospective test.

Key findings

Figures

The solvability frontier drawn as a disc: solved rows inside, open rows inside the circle at reach 0.762, outside rows beyond it
Figure 2. The frontier on 5,209 rows. Solved rows fill the inner disc by reach, open rows inside fill the ring up to the circle at 0.762, and outside rows sit beyond it by how far their reach falls short. Angle is the row's rank along the first two principal components of the embeddings.
Bar charts of the 5,209 rows by branch, status, form, source, licence, resolution evidence, posed and resolved years, zone, class, level, text kind and length
Figure 1. Make-up of the 5,209 rows under every label the pipeline reads: mathematics holds 4,112 rows, formal-conjectures supplies 3,567, Apache-2.0 covers 3,557, 687 rows carry a posed year, 309 a resolved year, and 2,194 are variants of another row.
Resolved rate by 2026 inside and outside the cutoff frontier at 2005 and 2021 under both codings and by length band
Figure 3. Resolved rate by 2026 inside and outside the cutoff frontier under both codings, over all scored rows, with the undated solved rows removed, and by length band.
Stacked bars of open problems per reach class, coloured by branch
Figure 4. Reach classes by branch: 268 close to known results, 863 borderline and 954 that need a new idea. Mathematics holds 264 of the 268 and 811 of the 863.

Data and code

Cite this paper

@techreport{dichio2026solvabilityfrontier,
  title        = {Machine learning for scientific discovery: the solvability frontier},
  author       = {Dichio, Gianangelo},
  institution  = {Bucket Foundation},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = {10},
  url          = {https://www.bucket.foundation/research/papers/solvability-frontier},
  note         = {Full report, version 1.0, 2026-10-08}
}